How can Artemisia annua and artemisinin help you? What the research says

Authors

Olivia Pearman is an experienced researcher who is passionate about access to scientific information. She has over a decade of research experience with a PhD from the University of Colorado at Boulder, a Master’s from the Yale School of the Environment, and a Bachelor of Science from Clemson University. Throughout her career, she has honed her skills in translating research for all audiences and is thrilled to work with CancerChoices to help make scientific knowledge available for everybody.

Olivia Pearman, PhD Research Associate

Nancy Hepp, MS

past Lead Researcher
View profile

Ms. Hepp is a researcher and communicator who has been writing and editing educational content on varied health topics for more than 20 years. She serves as lead researcher and writer for CancerChoices and also served as the first program manager. Her graduate work in research and cognitive psychology, her master’s degree in instructional design, and her certificate in web design have all guided her in writing and presenting information for a wide variety of audiences and uses. Nancy’s service as faculty development coordinator in the Department of Family Medicine at Wright State University also provided experience in medical research, plus insights into medical education and medical care from the professional’s perspective.

Nancy Hepp, MS past Lead Researcher

Laura Pole, MSN, RN, OCNS

Senior Clinical Consultant
View profile

Laura Pole is senior clinical consultant for CancerChoices. Laura is an oncology clinical nurse specialist who has been providing integrative oncology clinical care, navigation, consultation, and education services for over 40 years. She is the co-creator and co-coordinator of the Integrative Oncology Navigation Training at Smith Center for Healing and the Arts in Washington, DC. Laura also manages the “Media Watch Cancer News That You Can Use” listserv for Smith Center/Commonweal. In her role as a palliative care educator and consultant, Laura has served as statewide Respecting Choices Faculty for the Virginia POST (Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment) Collaborative as well as provided statewide professional education on palliative and end-of-life care for the Virginia Association for Hospices and Palliative Care.

For CancerChoices, Laura curates content and research, networks with clinical and organizational partners, brings awareness and education of integrative oncology at professional and patient conferences and programs, and translates research into information relevant to the patient experience as well as clinical practice.

Laura sees her work with CancerChoices as a perfect alignment of all her passions, knowledge and skills in integrative oncology care. She is honored to serve you.

Laura Pole, MSN, RN, OCNS Senior Clinical Consultant

Clinical reviewer

Dr. Meghan Zech is a board-certified Naturopathic Oncologist (FABNO) and Registered Herbalist dedicated to enhancing health and vitality through integrative, patient-centered care.

Meghan Zech, ND, FABNO

Last update: September 29, 2026

We summarize the clinical evidence for each medical benefit here. We begin with our assessment of the strength of evidence within each category, followed by a brief summary of individual studies or reviews of several studies. In assessing the strength of evidence, we consider the study design, number of participants, and the size of the treatment effect (how much outcomes changed with treatment).

To see more details, click the plus sign to the right of any section.

Artemisia/artemisinin research strengths:

  • There are some randomized controlled trials examining associations between artemisia/artemisinin-derived drugs and cancer treatment outcomes.

Artemisia/artemisinin research weaknesses:

  • There is very little clinical research on how artemisia or artemisinin-derived drugs might affect cancer risk, contribute to managing side effects, or make your body less hospitable to cancer.

Improving treatment outcomes

Is Artemisia annua linked to improved survival? Is it linked to less cancer growth or metastasis? Does it enhance the anticancer action of other treatments or therapies? We present the evidence.

Weak evidenceone or more case studies, supported by animal evidence OR small treatment effects of limited clinical significance OR studies with no controls OR weak trends of effects (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently) of short-term tumor response in a person with prostate cancer treated with Artemisia annua L capsules combined with conventional treatment

Weak evidence of temporary clinical effect in two people with skin cancer treated with artesunate combined with conventional treatment

Weak evidence of slowed disease progression but no improvement in 1-year survival among people with lung cancer treated with artesunate

Weak evidence of some clinical benefit among people with cervical cancer treated with artenimol-R

Weak evidence of no effect on cancer cell proliferation among people with colorectal cancer treated with artesunate

Weak evidence of some clinical benefit among people with brain cancer treated with artesunate

Brain cancer

Weak evidence of positive clinical effect among people with aggressive brain cancer treated with artesunate

Colorectal cancer

Weak evidence of no change in cancer cell proliferation among people with colorectal cancer treated with artesunate

Gynecologic cancer

Weak evidence of some better prognostic markers among people with cervical cancer treated with artenimol-R

Lung cancer

Weak evidence of better time to disease progression but no evidence of improved 1-year survival among people with non small-cell lung cancer treated with artesunate

Melanoma and other skin cancers

Weak evidence of better response to chemotherapy among 2 people with metastatic uveal melanoma treated with artesunate

Prostate cancer

Weak evidence of short-term tumor response in a person with prostate cancer treated with bicalutamide for 14 days and oral Artemisia annua L capsules long-term

Optimizing your body terrain

Does Artemisia annua promote an environment within your body that is less supportive of cancer development, growth, or spread? We present the evidence.

Weak evidenceone or more case studies, supported by animal evidence OR small treatment effects of limited clinical significance OR studies with no controls OR weak trends of effects (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently) of increased immune response among people with HIV treated with artesunate

Modest evidencesignificant effects in at least three small but well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs), or one or more well-designed, mid-sized clinical studies of reasonably good quality (RCTs or observational studies), or several small studies aggregated into a meta-analysis (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently) of lower inflammation among people with rheumatoid arthritis treated with Artemisia annua extract

See Optimizing Your Body Terrain ›

Find medical professionals who specialize in managing body terrain factors: Finding Integrative Oncologists and Other Practitioners ›

Immune function

Increased immune system activation is not always beneficial, so your oncology team needs to determine whether immune activation would be favorable in your situation.

Weak evidence of an increase of immune response among HIV-positive people treated with artesunate

Inflammation

Modest evidence of a lower marker of inflammation among people with active rheumatoid arthritis treated with extract of Artemisia annua L.

Managing side effects and promoting wellness

Is Artemisia annua linked to fewer or less severe side effects or symptoms? Is it linked to less toxicity from cancer treatment? Does it support your quality of life or promote general well-being? We present the evidence.

Weak evidenceone or more case studies, supported by animal evidence OR small treatment effects of limited clinical significance OR studies with no controls OR weak trends of effects (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently) of less pain and vaginal discharge among people with cervical cancer treated with artenimol-R

Pain

Weak evidence of less pain from cervical cancer among people with adenocarcinoma of the cervix treated with artenimol-R

Other symptoms and side effects

Weak evidence of less vaginal discharge from cervical cancer among people with adenocarcinoma of the cervix treated with artenimol-R

Reducing cancer risk

Is Artemisia annua linked to lower risks of developing cancer or of recurrence? We present the evidence.

Prostate cancer

Weak evidenceone or more case studies, supported by animal evidence OR small treatment effects of limited clinical significance OR studies with no controls OR weak trends of effects (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently) of no effect on risk of recurrence for one person with prostate cancer treated with artesunate

< Return to main Artemisia page

References[+]