What practices and therapies can help you manage your body weight?
Top practices and therapies for managing your body weight
Complementary therapies
Additional therapies and practices supported by less evidence are also listed below.
Strong, good, or modest evidence of benefit
Strong evidenceconsistent, significant effects in several large (or at least one very large) well designed clinical studies or at least two meta-analyses of clinical studies of moderate or better quality (or one large meta-analysis) finding similar results (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently) indicates confidence that the practice or therapy has an effect as noted. Good evidencesignificant effects in one large or several mid-sized and well-designed clinical studies (randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with an appropriate placebo or other strong comparison control or observational studies that control for confounds) (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently) indicates that the practice or therapy is linked to the outcomes described with reasonable certainty. Modest evidencesignificant effects in at least three small but well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs), or one or more well-designed, mid-sized clinical studies of reasonably good quality (RCTs or observational studies), or several small studies aggregated into a meta-analysis (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently) means the practice or therapy may be linked to the outcomes described, but with a lower degree of certainty.
The evidence for these effects is described in the reviews available through the image links.
Eating Well: mixed evidence
Not specific to cancer:
- More weight loss and less weight gain among people with body-mass index (BMI) higher than 25 eating more fruits and vegetables (good evidence)significant effects in one large or several mid-sized and well-designed clinical studies (randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with an appropriate placebo or other strong comparison control or observational studies that control for confounds) (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently)
- Lower body weight or more weight loss among people eating earlier instead of late in the day (modest evidence)
- Higher body weight among people with type 2 diabetes eating a late dinner(preliminary evidence)significant effects in small or poorly designed clinical studies OR conflicting results in adequate studies but a preponderance of evidence of an effect (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently)
- Lower body weight and a weak trend toward lower body mass index among people using nonsugar sweeteners (good evidence)
- Larger waist circumference among older adults drinking diet soda (preliminary evidence)
- Higher intake of calories among females, but not males, after drinking beverages containing sucralose (preliminary evidence)
- No evidence of an effectoverall, one or more studies did not demonstrate that a treatment or intervention led to an expected outcome; this does not always mean that there is no effect in clinical practice, but that the studies may have been underpowered (too few participants) or poorly designed. Larger, well-designed studies provide more confidence in making assessments. on obesity among people eating high-calorie (energy-dense) foods in a combined analysis of reviews and combined analyses
- No evidence of an effect on total daily energy expenditure, resting metabolic rate, or weight loss among overweight or obese people following a calorie-restricted diet with morning-loaded calories
Moving More: strong and good evidence
Less body fat and more lean body mass among people with cancer participating in exercise without regard to cancer treatment phase (strong evidence)consistent, significant effects in several large (or at least one very large) well designed clinical studies or at least two meta-analyses of clinical studies of moderate or better quality (or one large meta-analysis) finding similar results (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently)
Increased lean body mass and less body fat or obesity among people treated with neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or hormone therapy, including androgen deprivation therapy, when participating in exercise (good evidence)
More lean muscle mass among people with cancer participating in exercise, especially resistance training (good evidence)
Berberine: good evidence
Not specific to cancer:
- Lower measures of body weight among people treated with berberine (good evidence)
Fasting or calorie restriction: strong and preliminary evidence
Not specific to cancer:
- More weight loss and less body fat among people fasting, usually for 24 hours at a time (strong evidence)
- More weight loss and less body fat among people restricting calorie intake (strong evidence)
- More weight loss and less body fat among overweight people exercising to create an energy deficit of about 20% (preliminary evidence)
- More weight loss and less body fat among overweight people exercising to create an energy deficit of about 12.5% and exercising to increase total energy expenditure by 12.5% (preliminary evidence)
Green tea or EGCG: mixed evidence
Not specific to cancer:
- Lower weight, waist circumference, and body fat among people drinking green tea or beverages containing green tea catechins (not specific to cancer) (good evidence)
- Insufficient (conflicting) evidence of an effect on body weight or weight loss among people treated with green tea extracts in several combined studies (not specific to cancer)
Mediterranean diet: good evidence
Not specific to cancer:
- Lower body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, and/or body weight among people eating a Mediterranean diet (good evidence)
Metformin: good to preliminary evidence
Metformin is a prescription medication used to regulate blood sugar and insulin resistance. Ideally, it is paired with diet and exercise to bring blood sugar under control. We do not recommend its use primarily for weight loss, as it has some serious side effects, including increased risk of some types of cancer. We strongly recommend medical supervision of its use.
Lower body mass index among people with breast cancer and diabetes treated with metformin (modest evidence)
Lower body weight among people with cancer (not specific to diabetes) treated with metformin for longer than 1 to 5 weeks (good evidence)
Not specific to cancer:
- Lower body weight among nondiabetic people with endometrial hyperplasia without atypia treated with metformin (preliminary evidence)
- Lower body weight and waist circumference among people with metabolic imbalances other than diabetes treated with metformin (modest evidence)
Probiotics and prebiotics: mixed evidence
Not specific to cancer:
- Higher self-reported feelings of satiety among healthy adults treated with dietary prebiotics (not specific to cancer) (good evidence)
- No evidence of an effect on measures of body weight among adults with metabolic syndrome treated with various strains of probiotics or synbiotics in a combined analysis of studies
- Weak evidence of lower measures of body weight among overweight or obese and insulin-resistant people treated with pasteurized Akkermansia muciniphila
- Preliminary evidence of lower measures of body weight among women with polycystic ovarian syndrome treated with synbiotics
- No evidence of an effect on measures of body weight or composition among overweight, obese, or prediabetic people treated with prebiotics in 2 small studies
Tai chi or qigong: good evidence
Not specific to cancer:
- Less body fat among people with or at risk of metabolic syndrome practicing tai chi (good evidence)
Yoga: good evidence
Not specific to cancer:
- Better body weight and waist circumference among people practicing yoga (good evidence)
Therapies with preliminary or weak evidence of benefit for body weight
Preliminary evidencesignificant effects in small or poorly designed clinical studies OR conflicting results in adequate studies but a preponderance of evidence of an effect (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently) means the practice or therapy may be linked to the outcomes described, although substantial uncertainty remains. Weak evidenceone or more case studies, supported by animal evidence OR small treatment effects of limited clinical significance OR studies with no controls OR weak trends of effects (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently) may mean that the effects are small or that a high degree of uncertainty remains about the links between the practice or therapy and the outcomes described.
No evidence of benefit
No evidence of an effect on measures of body weight among overweight or obese people treated with quercetin in a combined analysis of studies
Not specific to cancer:
- No evidence of an effect on body weight among postmenopausal women treated with vitamin D in a small study
Find a physician knowledgeable about terrain factors in cancer care
Metabolic Terrain Institute of Health: These practitioners are trained regarding appropriate therapies to optimize body terrain as part of an integrative cancer care plan.