A natural product commonly used in traditional Chinese medicine herbal mixtures may help to improve quality of life, manage side effects, and treat certain cancers.

How can astragalus help you? What the research says

We summarize the clinical evidence for each medical benefit here. We begin with our assessment of the strength of evidence within each category, followed by a brief summary of individual studies or reviews of several studies. In assessing the strength of evidence, we consider the study design, number of participants, and the size of the treatment effect (how much outcomes changed with treatment).

To see more details, click the plus sign to the right of any section.

Preclinical evidence is summarized in Are you a health professional? ›

Improving treatment outcomes

Is astragalus linked to improved survival? Is it linked to less cancer growth or metastasis? Does it enhance the anticancer action of other treatments or therapies? We present the evidence.

Cancer as a whole

Modest evidencesignificant effects in at least three small but well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs), or one or more well-designed, mid-sized clinical studies of reasonably good quality (RCTs or observational studies), or several small studies aggregated into a meta-analysis (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently): People with cancer treated with injected astragalus showed better response to chemoradiotherapy.

Advanced cancer

Good evidencesignificant effects in one large or several mid-sized and well-designed clinical studies (randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with an appropriate placebo or other strong comparison control or observational studies that control for confounds) (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently): People with stage 3–4 non-small cell lung cancer treated with injected astragalus showed better response and one-year survival after chemotherapy. For people with advanced stomach cancer, preliminary evidencesignificant effects in small or poorly designed clinical studies OR conflicting results in adequate studies but a preponderance of evidence of an effect (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently) of better response to FOLFOX among those treated with injected astragalus.

For people with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with astragalus polysaccharide injection, no evidence of an effectoverall, one or more studies did not demonstrate that a treatment or intervention led to an expected outcome; this does not always mean that there is no effect in clinical practice, but that the studies may have been underpowered (too few participants) or poorly designed. Larger, well-designed studies provide more confidence in making assessments. on response to chemoradiotherapy.

Gastrointestinal cancer

Good evidence: People with liver cancer treated with injected astragalus polysaccharides after treatment with TACE (transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization) showed better survival, clinical response, and performance status.

Leukemia

Modest evidencesignificant effects in at least three small but well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs), or one or more well-designed, mid-sized clinical studies of reasonably good quality (RCTs or observational studies), or several small studies aggregated into a meta-analysis (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently): People with acute myeloid leukemia treated with astragalus showed substantially lower mortality after standard treatments in one study.

Preliminary evidence: Children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with injected astragalus showed fewer cases of minimal residual disease (the presence of a small number of cancer cells that may cause recurrence) but no effect on rates of complete remission after initial drug treatment.

Lung cancer

Insufficient (conflicting) evidencepreclinical evidence only OR clinical studies with such poor or unclear methodology that no conclusion can be drawn OR conflicting findings across clinical studies with no preponderance of evidence in one direction; conflicting evidence occurs when studies find conflicting effects (positive effect vs no effect or negative effect) with the same treatment and the same general study population (same cancer type, for example) (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently): People with lung cancer treated with astragalus showed better response to conventional treatment, or no effect on disease control, in different studies.

Astragalus combined with other therapies

Optimizing your body terrain

Does astragalus promote an environment within your body that is less supportive of cancer development, growth, or spread? We present the evidence.

See Optimizing Your Body Terrain ›

Find medical professionals who specialize in managing body terrain factors: Finding Integrative Oncologists and Other Practitioners ›

We also recommend that you share with your doctor the information here about how astragalus might affect these terrain factors if you have any imbalances.

Immune function

Increased immune system activation is not always beneficial, so your oncology team needs to determine whether immune activation would be favorable in your situation.

Modest evidencesignificant effects in at least three small but well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs), or one or more well-designed, mid-sized clinical studies of reasonably good quality (RCTs or observational studies), or several small studies aggregated into a meta-analysis (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently): People with cancer treated with injected astragalus together with standard treatment showed higher markers of immune activation than those using standard treatment alone.

Inflammation

Weak evidenceone or more case studies, supported by animal evidence OR small treatment effects of limited clinical significance OR studies with no controls OR weak trends of effects (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently): People with advanced metastatic cancers (breast, colorectal, head and neck, liver, lung, pancreas, and stomach) treated with intravenous astragalus had lower levels of inflammatory markers in a small study.

Managing side effects and promoting wellness

Is astragalus linked to fewer or less severe side effects or symptoms? Is it linked to less toxicity from cancer treatment? Does it support your quality of life or promote general well-being? We present the evidence.

Blood-related side effects

Preliminary evidencesignificant effects in small or poorly designed clinical studies OR conflicting results in adequate studies but a preponderance of evidence of an effect (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently): People with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with injected astragalus had lower rates of bone marrow suppression during platinum-based chemotherapy in some studies. In other studies, people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with injected astragalus showed no changes in incidence of leukopeniaan abnormally low number of white cells in the blood, leading to increased susceptibility to infection.

Changes in appetite

Weak evidenceone or more case studies, supported by animal evidence OR small treatment effects of limited clinical significance OR studies with no controls OR weak trends of effects (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently): People with advanced metastatic cancers treated with astragalus polysaccharides showed better appetite in a small study.

Fatigue

Weak evidence: People with advanced metastatic cancers treated with injected astragalus showed less fatigue in a small study.

Gastrointestinal symptoms

Modest evidencesignificant effects in at least three small but well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs), or one or more well-designed, mid-sized clinical studies of reasonably good quality (RCTs or observational studies), or several small studies aggregated into a meta-analysis (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently): People with stomach cancer treated with astragalus polysaccharides injections had fewer gastrointestinal side effects from FOLFOX treatment, including less nausea and vomiting.

Preliminary evidence: People with non-small cell lung cancer treated with injected astragalus showed fewer gastrointestinal adverse events and/or less vomiting during conventional treatment.

Infection

Preliminary evidence: Children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with injected astragalus showed lower incidence of infection after remission-induction chemotherapy in a small study.

Pain

Preliminary evidence: People with advanced cancers treated with astragalus polysaccharides showed less pain in small studies.

Quality of life and physical function

Modest evidence: People with non-small cell lung cancer or stomach cancer treated with injected astragalus showed better quality of life and physical function during chemotherapy.

Sleep disruption

Weak evidence: People with advanced metastatic cancers treated with injected astragalus showed better sleep in a small study.

Astragalus combined with other therapies
Symptoms not specific to cancer

Keep reading about astragalus

Authors

Maria Williams

Research and Communications Consultant
View profile

Maria Williams is a research and communications consultant who brings over 15 years’ experience in research, consumer education, and science communication to CancerChoices. She has worked primarily in public health and environmental health.

Maria Williams Research and Communications Consultant

Laura Pole, MSN, RN, OCNS

Senior Clinical Consultant
View profile

Laura Pole is senior clinical consultant for CancerChoices. Laura is an oncology clinical nurse specialist who has been providing integrative oncology clinical care, navigation, consultation, and education services for over 40 years. She is the co-creator and co-coordinator of the Integrative Oncology Navigation Training at Smith Center for Healing and the Arts in Washington, DC. Laura also manages the “Media Watch Cancer News That You Can Use” listserv for Smith Center/Commonweal. In her role as a palliative care educator and consultant, Laura has served as statewide Respecting Choices Faculty for the Virginia POST (Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment) Collaborative as well as provided statewide professional education on palliative and end-of-life care for the Virginia Association for Hospices and Palliative Care.

For CancerChoices, Laura curates content and research, networks with clinical and organizational partners, brings awareness and education of integrative oncology at professional and patient conferences and programs, and translates research into information relevant to the patient experience as well as clinical practice.

Laura sees her work with CancerChoices as a perfect alignment of all her passions, knowledge and skills in integrative oncology care. She is honored to serve you.

Laura Pole, MSN, RN, OCNS Senior Clinical Consultant

Nancy Hepp, MS

past Lead Researcher
View profile

Ms. Hepp is a researcher and communicator who has been writing and editing educational content on varied health topics for more than 20 years. She serves as lead researcher and writer for CancerChoices and also served as the first program manager. Her graduate work in research and cognitive psychology, her master’s degree in instructional design, and her certificate in web design have all guided her in writing and presenting information for a wide variety of audiences and uses. Nancy’s service as faculty development coordinator in the Department of Family Medicine at Wright State University also provided experience in medical research, plus insights into medical education and medical care from the professional’s perspective.

Nancy Hepp, MS past Lead Researcher

Andrew Jackson, ND

Research Associate
View profile

Andrew Jackson, ND, serves as a CancerChoices research associate. As a naturopathic physician practicing in Kirkland, Washington, he teaches critical evaluation of the medical literture at Bastyr University in Kenmore, Washington. His great appreciation of scientific inquiry and the scientific process has led him to view research with a critical eye.

Andrew Jackson, ND Research Associate

Last update: August 13, 2025

Last full literature review: May 2024

CancerChoices provides information about integrative in cancer care, a patient-centered approach combining the best of conventional care, self care and evidence-informed complementary care in an integrated plan cancer care. We review complementaryin cancer care, complementary care involves the use of therapies intended to enhance or add to standard conventional treatments; examples include supplements, mind-body approaches such as yoga or psychosocial therapy, and acupuncture therapies and self-care lifestyle actions and behaviors that may impact cancer outcomes; examples include eating health-promoting foods, limiting alcohol, increasing physical activity, and managing stress practices to help patients and professionals explore and integrate the best combination of conventionalthe cancer care offered by conventionally trained physicians and most hospitals; examples are chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy and complementary therapies and practices for each person.

Our staff have no financial conflicts of interest to declare. We receive no funds from any manufacturers or retailers gaining financial profit by promoting or discouraging therapies mentioned on this site.

Learn more

References[+]