Copper promotes the formation of blood vessels, including those that supply tumors. Depleting copper can deprive the tumor of a blood supply of oxygen and nutrients. 

How can copper chelation help you? What the research says

We summarize the clinical evidence for each medical benefit here. We begin with our assessment of the strength of evidence within each category, followed by a brief summary of individual studies or reviews of several studies. In assessing the strength of evidence, we consider the study design, number of participants, and the size of the treatment effect (how much outcomes changed with treatment).

To see more details, click the plus sign to the right of any section.

Preclinical evidence showing effects in many other types of cancer is in Are you a health professional?

Improving treatment outcomes

Is copper chelation linked to improved survival? Is it linked to less cancer growth or metastasis? Does it enhance the anticancer action of other treatments or therapies? We present the evidence.

Both serum and tumor copper levels are elevated in a variety of malignancies, including both solid tumor and blood cancer. Elevated copper levels have been shown to be directly associated with cancer progression: copper levels rise as cancer progresses.1Gupte A, Mumper RJ. Elevated copper and oxidative stress in cancer cells as a target for cancer treatment. Cancer Treatment Reviews. 2009 Feb;35(1):32-46.

Advanced or metastatic cancer

Weak evidenceone or more case studies, supported by animal evidence OR small treatment effects of limited clinical significance OR studies with no controls OR weak trends of effects (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently): In 3 out of 4 small studies, people with advanced cancer or advanced solid tumors treated with copper chelates (tetrathiomolybdate (TM) or ATN-224 respectively) showed improved stable disease. However, preliminary evidencesignificant effects in small or poorly designed clinical studies OR conflicting results in adequate studies but a preponderance of evidence of an effect (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently) of better overall survival among people with advanced esophageal cancer treated with conventional therapies and TM in a small study.

Breast cancer

Preliminary evidencesignificant effects in small or poorly designed clinical studies OR conflicting results in adequate studies but a preponderance of evidence of an effect (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently): women with breast cancer, including those with triple-negative breast cancer, treated with tetrathiomolybdate (TM) showed better progression-free survivalthe time during and after treatment of a disease that a patient lives without disease progression (worsening) in a few small studies. Additional weak evidenceone or more case studies, supported by animal evidence OR small treatment effects of limited clinical significance OR studies with no controls OR weak trends of effects (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently) of women with triple-negative breast cancer treated with TM showing a low rate of relapse in a small study.

Mesothelioma

Preliminary evidence: In a small study, people with stage 1 or 2 mesothelioma treated with tetrathiomolybdate showed a longer time to disease progression after cytoreduction (but no evidence of an effectoverall, one or more studies did not demonstrate that a treatment or intervention led to an expected outcome; this does not always mean that there is no effect in clinical practice, but that the studies may have been underpowered (too few participants) or poorly designed. Larger, well-designed studies provide more confidence in making assessments. with stage 3 disease).

Prostate cancer

Weak evidence: People with biochemically recurrent hormone-naïve prostate cancer treated with ATN-224 had slower PSAprostate-specific antigen: a protein produced by both normal and malignant cells of the prostate gland; the blood level of PSA is often elevated in men with prostate cancer progression, and PSA doubling times less than 12 months, in a small study.

Copper chelation combined with other therapies

Optimizing your body terrain

Does copper chelation promote an environment within your body that is less supportive of cancer development, growth, or spread? We present the evidence.

See Optimizing Your Body Terrain ›

Find medical professionals who specialize in managing body terrain factors: Finding Integrative Oncologists and Other Practitioners ›

EPCs and LOX

Weak evidenceone or more case studies, supported by animal evidence OR small treatment effects of limited clinical significance OR studies with no controls OR weak trends of effects (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently): Women with stage 2-4 triple negative breast cancer treated with tetrathiomolybdate had fewer cells critical for metastatic progression (bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells) and lower levels of lysyl oxidase (LOX) and other components of the tumor microenvironment in a few small studies.

Inflammation

No evidence: People with asymptomatic metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer treated with tetrathiomolybdate showed no changes in markers of inflammation in a small study.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels

Preliminary evidencesignificant effects in small or poorly designed clinical studies OR conflicting results in adequate studies but a preponderance of evidence of an effect (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently): People with stage 1 or 2 malignant pleural mesothelioma treated with tetrathiomolybdate showed lower VEGF levels after surgery in a small study. VEGF stimulates the formation of new blood vessels that can supply tumors.

Reducing cancer risk

Is copper chelation linked to lower risks of developing cancer or of recurrence? We present the evidence.

Gastrointestinal cancer

Preliminary evidencesignificant effects in small or poorly designed clinical studies OR conflicting results in adequate studies but a preponderance of evidence of an effect (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently): People with resectable, locally advanced esophageal cancer treated with tetrathiomolybdate showed lower risk of recurrence after chemotherapy and radiotherapy followed by transhiatal esophagectomy in a small study.

Helpful links

Keep reading about copper chelation

Authors

Laura Pole, MSN, RN, OCNS

Senior Clinical Consultant
View profile

Laura Pole is senior clinical consultant for CancerChoices. Laura is an oncology clinical nurse specialist who has been providing integrative oncology clinical care, navigation, consultation, and education services for over 40 years. She is the co-creator and co-coordinator of the Integrative Oncology Navigation Training at Smith Center for Healing and the Arts in Washington, DC. Laura also manages the “Media Watch Cancer News That You Can Use” listserv for Smith Center/Commonweal. In her role as a palliative care educator and consultant, Laura has served as statewide Respecting Choices Faculty for the Virginia POST (Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment) Collaborative as well as provided statewide professional education on palliative and end-of-life care for the Virginia Association for Hospices and Palliative Care.

For CancerChoices, Laura curates content and research, networks with clinical and organizational partners, brings awareness and education of integrative oncology at professional and patient conferences and programs, and translates research into information relevant to the patient experience as well as clinical practice.

Laura sees her work with CancerChoices as a perfect alignment of all her passions, knowledge and skills in integrative oncology care. She is honored to serve you.

Laura Pole, MSN, RN, OCNS Senior Clinical Consultant

Nancy Hepp, MS

past Lead Researcher
View profile

Ms. Hepp is a researcher and communicator who has been writing and editing educational content on varied health topics for more than 20 years. She serves as lead researcher and writer for CancerChoices and also served as the first program manager. Her graduate work in research and cognitive psychology, her master’s degree in instructional design, and her certificate in web design have all guided her in writing and presenting information for a wide variety of audiences and uses. Nancy’s service as faculty development coordinator in the Department of Family Medicine at Wright State University also provided experience in medical research, plus insights into medical education and medical care from the professional’s perspective.

Nancy Hepp, MS past Lead Researcher

Reviewers

Silvia G. Corral, MD, is an established family medicine physician with Medical Patient Advocacy in Santa Barbara, California. She has 36 years of experience in her field with special expertise in cancer recovery. Dr. Corral received her medical degree at Stanford University and then interned at the University of California, Los Angeles. She is board certified by the American Board of Family Medicine and member of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Silvia G. Corral, MD

Jen Green, ND, FABNO

Naturopathic oncologist and CancerChoices advisor
View profile

Dr. Green is a naturopathic physician who is board-certified in naturopathic oncology (FABNO). Dr. Green is also a cofounder/research director for Knowledge in Integrative Oncology Website, a nonprofit website that harvests up-to-date research in integrative oncology to support evidence-informed decision making. Dr. Green has published scientific articles in journals such as the American Urology Association Update SeriesJournal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine and Natural Medicine Journal.

Jen Green, ND, FABNO Naturopathic oncologist and CancerChoices advisor

Last update: June 26, 2025

Last full literature review: August 2024

CancerChoices provides information about integrative in cancer care, a patient-centered approach combining the best of conventional care, self care and evidence-informed complementary care in an integrated plan cancer care. We review complementaryin cancer care, complementary care involves the use of therapies intended to enhance or add to standard conventional treatments; examples include supplements, mind-body approaches such as yoga or psychosocial therapy, and acupuncture therapies and self-care lifestyle actions and behaviors that may impact cancer outcomes; examples include eating health-promoting foods, limiting alcohol, increasing physical activity, and managing stress practices to help patients and professionals explore and integrate the best combination of conventionalthe cancer care offered by conventionally trained physicians and most hospitals; examples are chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy and complementary therapies and practices for each person.

Our staff have no financial conflicts of interest to declare. We receive no funds from any manufacturers or retailers gaining financial profit by promoting or discouraging therapies mentioned on this site.

Learn more

References[+]