Extracts of turkey tail mushroom (Trametes versicolor) and its constituent PSK are used with conventional cancer treatment to improve survival and reduce risk of recurrence. The constituent PSP shows some benefit for pain, appetite, and percentage of body fat.

How can turkey tail mushroom help you? What the research says

We summarize the clinical evidence for each medical benefit here. We begin with our assessment of the strength of evidence within each category, followed by a brief summary of individual studies or reviews of several studies. In assessing the strength of evidence, we consider the study design, number of participants, and the size of the treatment effect (how much outcomes changed with treatment).

To see more details, click the plus sign to the right of any section.

Preclinical evidence is summarized in Are you a health professional? ›

Improving treatment outcomes

Is turkey tail mushroom linked to improved survival? Is it linked to less cancer growth or metastasis? Does it enhance the anticancer action of other treatments or therapies? We present the evidence.

Cancer as a whole

Modest evidencesignificant effects in at least three small but well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs), or one or more well-designed, mid-sized clinical studies of reasonably good quality (RCTs or observational studies), or several small studies aggregated into a meta-analysis (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently) of slightly better survival: People with cancer treated with turkey tail alongside conventional treatment showed slightly better survival in multiple studies.

Breast cancer

Preliminary evidencesignificant effects in small or poorly designed clinical studies OR conflicting results in adequate studies but a preponderance of evidence of an effect (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently) of slightly longer survival: People with breast cancer treated with turkey tail alongside chemotherapy showed slightly longer survival in three studies.

Colorectal cancer

Good evidencesignificant effects in one large or several mid-sized and well-designed clinical studies (randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with an appropriate placebo or other strong comparison control or observational studies that control for confounds) (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently): People with colorectal cancer who were treated with PSK alongside chemotherapy showed better survival across several studies, with stronger evidence for those taking it alongside oral chemotherapy (as opposed to intravenous). There was preliminary evidence that people with certain biomarkers – detectable serum immunosuppressive acidic protein (IAP) or a carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level of 3ng/mL or more – were more likely to benefit. One trial among people with rectal cancer alone did not show evidence of better survival.

Gastrointestinal cancer

Colorectal cancer is listed separately.

No evidence of an effectoverall, one or more studies did not demonstrate that a treatment or intervention led to an expected outcome; this does not always mean that there is no effect in clinical practice, but that the studies may have been underpowered (too few participants) or poorly designed. Larger, well-designed studies provide more confidence in making assessments.: People with esophageal cancer treated with turkey tail alongside conventional treatment showed no evidence of an effect on survival across two studies.

No evidence of an effect: People with hepatocellular carcinoma whose liver function was too poor for standard treatment showed no evidence of an effect on survival in one study.

Good evidence: People with stomach cancer who were treated with PSK or turkey tail alongside chemotherapy showed better survival across several combined analyses of studies. There was preliminary evidence that people with stage 3A or 3B stomach cancer, and people with certain immune profiles, were more likely to benefit. There was also preliminary evidence that people whose tumors expressed the biomarker programmed death ligand 1 (PDL-1) were less likely to benefit.

Head, neck, and oral cancers

Preliminary evidence: People with nasopharyngeal cancer who were treated with PSK alongside radiotherapy showed better survival in one small study.

Leukemia

Preliminary evidence: People with leukemia treated with PSK added to chemotherapy showed better survival in one study.

Lung cancer

Preliminary evidence for specific patients: People with lung cancer who were treated with PSK showed slightly longer survival in two studies, with one finding a benefit for those with stage 3 but not stage 4 cancer.

Optimizing your body terrain

Does turkey tail mushroom promote an environment within your body that is less supportive of cancer development, growth, or spread? We present the evidence.

See Optimizing Your Body Terrain ›

Find medical professionals who specialize in managing body terrain factors: Finding Integrative Oncologists and Other Practitioners ›

Immune function

Increased immune system activation is not always beneficial, so your oncology team needs to determine whether immune activation would be favorable in your situation.

Preliminary evidencesignificant effects in small or poorly designed clinical studies OR conflicting results in adequate studies but a preponderance of evidence of an effect (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently): People treated with PSP or turkey tail following conventional cancer treatment showed biomarkers of higher immune function in two small studies.

Turkey tail mushroom combined with other complementary therapies

Managing side effects and promoting wellness

Is turkey tail mushroom linked to fewer or less severe side effects or symptoms? Is it linked to less toxicity from cancer treatment? Does it support your quality of life or promote general well-being? We present the evidence.

Body composition or cachexia

Preliminary evidencesignificant effects in small or poorly designed clinical studies OR conflicting results in adequate studies but a preponderance of evidence of an effect (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently): People with advanced lung cancer treated with PSP showed more body fat in one study. Loss of body fat is a concern among people with advanced cancer, and increasing body fat, as in this study, is a benefit.

Changes in appetite

Preliminary evidence: People with liver cancer and poor liver function who were treated with PSP showed better appetite in one small study.

Pain

Preliminary evidence: People with hepatocellular carcinoma and poor liver function treated with PSP  reported  less pain in one small study.

Reducing cancer risk

Is turkey tail mushroom linked to lower risks of developing cancer or of recurrence? We present the evidence.

Colorectal cancer

Modest evidencesignificant effects in at least three small but well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs), or one or more well-designed, mid-sized clinical studies of reasonably good quality (RCTs or observational studies), or several small studies aggregated into a meta-analysis (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently) of a lower risk of recurrence: People treated with PSK together with chemotherapy for colon cancer had a lower risk of recurrence in four studies. There was preliminary evidencesignificant effects in small or poorly designed clinical studies OR conflicting results in adequate studies but a preponderance of evidence of an effect (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently) that people with certain biomarker profiles (detectable serum immunosuppressive acidic protein, or IAP; a carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level of >3ng/m; or a purified protein derivative reaction (PPD) of <19mm) were more likely to benefit.

Gastrointestinal cancer

Colorectal cancer is listed separately.

Preliminary evidence for certain people: People with stage 2 or 3 stomach cancer whose tumors did not express a certain biomarker (MHC class 1) and who were treated with PSK plus chemotherapy after surgery showed a lower risk of recurrence in one study.

Gynecological cancer

Preliminary evidence: People who tested positive for human papilloma virus (HPV), which increases the risk of cervical cancer, and who were treated with a turkey tail-infused vaginal gel showed lower markers of cervical and uterine cancer risk in one study.

Head and neck cancer

No evidence of an effectoverall, one or more studies did not demonstrate that a treatment or intervention led to an expected outcome; this does not always mean that there is no effect in clinical practice, but that the studies may have been underpowered (too few participants) or poorly designed. Larger, well-designed studies provide more confidence in making assessments.: People with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with PSK plus radiotherapy did not show evidence of an effect on their  risk of recurrence in one small study.

Leukemia

Weak evidenceone or more case studies, supported by animal evidence OR small treatment effects of limited clinical significance OR studies with no controls OR weak trends of effects (this is the CancerChoices definition; other researchers and studies may define this differently): People with leukemia treated with PSK alongside chemotherapy showed a lower risk of recurrence in one study.

Helpful links

Keep reading about turkey tail mushroom

Authors

Sophie Kakarala

Research Assistant
View profile

Sophie received her Bachelor of Arts from the University of Cambridge, where she studied Middle Eastern languages and the philosophy of science. She then completed a premedical post-baccalaureate at the City University of New York. Before joining CancerChoices, she worked for several years at the Cornell Center for Research on End-of-Life Care, where she helped to conduct research on terminal illness and grief. Working in end-of-life research filled her with the conviction that all patients deserve free, accessible, and scientifically accurate information about the therapies available to them. While taking classes in anthropology, she also became curious about traditional medical knowledge and philosophies. These interests led her to CancerChoices. She is delighted to be part of CancerChoices’s work creating rigorous, evidence-based treatment guides for patients and physicians.

Sophie Kakarala Research Assistant

With a focus on preventing and reversing heart disease and obesity, Larry Scherwitz’s areas of research expertise are Lifestyle Medicine; epigenetics as a mediator between lifestyle, wellness or illness; and the evidence-based Whole Person Integrative Eating (WPIE) model and program for overcoming overeating, overweight, and obesity. With a key focus on Lifestyle Medicine and the science-backed Whole Person Integrative Eating dietary lifestyle, he researches preventing, managing, and reversing lifestyle-based chronic conditions, such as heart disease, obesity, and diabetes.

Highlights of his professional experience:

Director of Research and Sr. Research Scientist on Dean Ornish, M.D.’s program for reversing heart disease with comprehensive changes diet, exercise, stress management, and social support.

Principal investigator on more than 30 research projects conducted at universities, medical centers, and medical schools ranging from University of California, San Francisco and California Pacific Medical Center in San Francisco to the Heinrich Heine University in Düsseldorf, Germany.

Specialist in all phases of qualitative and quantitative research including designing, implementing and analyzing results of clinical trials to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nutriceuticals, lifestyle changes, mind/body therapies, and devices (for FDA approval).

Core competencies in every phase of research including literature reviews, performing statistical analyses, writing IRB and study protocols, research papers, and grant proposals.

International and national keynote speaker, workshop leader, and focus group leader.

Co-author of four health books: Make Weight Loss Last (based on original research that identifies 7 eating styles that lead to overeating), The Enlightened Diet: Seven Weight Loss Solutions that Nourish Body, Mind, and Soul, Pottenger’s Prophecy: How Food Resets Genes for Wellness or Illness, and more recently, the award-winning Whole Person Integrative Eating: A Breakthrough Dietary Lifestyle to Treat the Root Causes of Overeating, Overweight, and Obesity.

Scherwitz received his doctorate in Social Psychology from the University of Texas, Austin, and trained in psychophysiology at Harvard Medical School.

Larry Scherwitz

Previous Authors

Nancy Hepp, MS

past Lead Researcher
View profile

Ms. Hepp is a researcher and communicator who has been writing and editing educational content on varied health topics for more than 20 years. She serves as lead researcher and writer for CancerChoices and also served as the first program manager. Her graduate work in research and cognitive psychology, her master’s degree in instructional design, and her certificate in web design have all guided her in writing and presenting information for a wide variety of audiences and uses. Nancy’s service as faculty development coordinator in the Department of Family Medicine at Wright State University also provided experience in medical research, plus insights into medical education and medical care from the professional’s perspective.

Nancy Hepp, MS past Lead Researcher

Andrew Jackson, ND

Research Associate
View profile

Andrew Jackson, ND, serves as a CancerChoices research associate. As a naturopathic physician practicing in Kirkland, Washington, he teaches critical evaluation of the medical literture at Bastyr University in Kenmore, Washington. His great appreciation of scientific inquiry and the scientific process has led him to view research with a critical eye.

Andrew Jackson, ND Research Associate

Laura Pole, MSN, RN, OCNS

Senior Clinical Consultant
View profile

Laura Pole is senior clinical consultant for CancerChoices. Laura is an oncology clinical nurse specialist who has been providing integrative oncology clinical care, navigation, consultation, and education services for over 40 years. She is the co-creator and co-coordinator of the Integrative Oncology Navigation Training at Smith Center for Healing and the Arts in Washington, DC. Laura also manages the “Media Watch Cancer News That You Can Use” listserv for Smith Center/Commonweal. In her role as a palliative care educator and consultant, Laura has served as statewide Respecting Choices Faculty for the Virginia POST (Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment) Collaborative as well as provided statewide professional education on palliative and end-of-life care for the Virginia Association for Hospices and Palliative Care.

For CancerChoices, Laura curates content and research, networks with clinical and organizational partners, brings awareness and education of integrative oncology at professional and patient conferences and programs, and translates research into information relevant to the patient experience as well as clinical practice.

Laura sees her work with CancerChoices as a perfect alignment of all her passions, knowledge and skills in integrative oncology care. She is honored to serve you.

Laura Pole, MSN, RN, OCNS Senior Clinical Consultant

Last update: August 31, 2025

Last full literature review: October 2021

CancerChoices provides information about integrative in cancer care, a patient-centered approach combining the best of conventional care, self care and evidence-informed complementary care in an integrated plan cancer care. We review complementaryin cancer care, complementary care involves the use of therapies intended to enhance or add to standard conventional treatments; examples include supplements, mind-body approaches such as yoga or psychosocial therapy, and acupuncture therapies and self-care lifestyle actions and behaviors that may impact cancer outcomes; examples include eating health-promoting foods, limiting alcohol, increasing physical activity, and managing stress practices to help patients and professionals explore and integrate the best combination of conventionalthe cancer care offered by conventionally trained physicians and most hospitals; examples are chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy and complementary therapies and practices for each person.

Our staff have no financial conflicts of interest to declare. We receive no funds from any manufacturers or retailers gaining financial profit by promoting or discouraging therapies mentioned on this site.

Learn more

References[+]